Seattle’s New Tree Ordinance

Seattle's 2023 Tree Protection Ordinance

Some good things, some bad things,  a questionable process, and a lot of controversy

The much anticipated Seattle Tree Protection Ordinance  was passed by the Seattle City Council May 23rd with  a June signing ceremony and press conference planned by the mayor’s office. But there was no signing ceremony or press conference… the controversy around this legislation had already become the main story.

First, Some History

  • First Tree ordinance passed 2001 (Jan Drago – sponsor)
  • Exceptional Tree Director’s Rule –2008
  • Interim Tree Ordinance 2009 (Richard Conlin – sponsor)
  • Urban Forestry Commission (UFC) created 2009 (Nick Licata – sponsor)
  • SDCI released 2 drafts of Tree Ordinance 2010/2011 to weaken tree protection
  • 2017 draft Ordinance to weaken tree protection (Rob Johnson)
  • 2019 draft Tree Ordinance by the Seattle UFC ignored by Council and Mayor
  • 2022 draft Tree Ordinance released and challenged by the Master Builders of King and Snohomish Counties (MBAKS)
  • 2023 passed Tree Ordinance rewritten with assistance of MBAKS

The Controversy

Mostly related to the parts of the ordinance written for and by the developer lobby

Major coup for the development lobby:
  • Low-rise residential zones: Guaranteed 85% hardscape allowance
  • Mixed-use zones: Guaranteed 100% hardscape allowance.
  • Neighborhood Residential: Allowance for the removal of exceptional trees for  all types of construction projects (includes building roads etc for lot subdivision in master use projects) , rather than being limited to grading and  permitting projects. A land-use attorney recently opined that the associated tree loss could be massive.
In the press:

Some Actual Good Parts of the Ordinance!

Related to property not being developed 

  • Reduced exceptional trees definition (Tier 2) from 30” DBH to 24” DBH
  • Added tree groves (8 trees 12” DBH and larger) to exceptional trees (Tier 2) in ordinance
  • Tree groves can cross property lines
  • Grove remains a grove even if a tree or trees are removed during development
  • Limited non-development tree removal to two 6-12″ DBH trees/3 years from 9 non-exceptional trees(old exceptional tree definition, so any trees < 30″ DBH) /3 years in NR, LR, MR, Commercial and Seattle MIxed Zones
  • Registration of Tree Service Providers with SDCI, online reporting of removal of any trees 6+ inches DBH 6 business days prior to removal. Both for property owners and development. Tree Service Provider trucks must identify the company name.

    Urgently Needed Fixes and Changes

    • An outside evaluation of the impact of the new Tree Protection Ordinance and Seattle’s tree canopy.
    • Remove the 85% lot coverage guarantee for development in LR zone and 100% lot coverage guaranteed for MR zone, Seattle Mixed and Commercial zones.
    • Require a permit and limit developer removal of tier-2 trees to those in the building footprint only when its determined that the building cannot be moved in order for the developer to achieve their highest use of the property.
    • Require developers to maximize the retention of all trees 6” DSH and larger during entire development process.
    • Require Tree Inventory and Tree Plan (Landscaping Plan) be done before any building permit is issued. Portland, Oregon requires this. Include all trees 6” DBH and larger.
    • Require 20% for MF zones and 40% for NR zones Tree Retention and Tree Planting Areas like Portland, Oregon has set up as an option.
    • Lower tree grove requirements to 6 trees from 8 trees 12” DSH and larger. Portland, Oregon grove size is 6 trees.
    • Include street trees in tree grove definition.
    • Require street trees be planted when ADU’s are built. Currently they are exempt.
    • Require street trees be planted for any addition over 500 square feet. Currently, it is only required for over 1000 square feet additions.
    • Harrell’s One Seattle Tree Fund for in lieu fees needs to be in the Ordinance.
    • Time frame to update in-lieu fees, should be at least every 2 years in budget process.
      Start $17.87/square inch diameter at 12” DSH not 24” DSH. Ordinance says only $2800 for any 12- 24 inch DSH trees while Parks says $4000 is their cost to plant and maintain tree for 5 years. Adopted in-lieu fee in Director’s Rule is higher than last year.
    • Spell out zones not covered by ordinance rather than say “all other zones” are exempt from ordinance. Add industrial zone to ordinance.
    Robert-Van-Pelt

    Seattle forest ecologist finds, climbs and illustrates our biggest trees

    Seattle forest ecologist finds, climbs and illustrates our biggest trees

    Robert-Van-Pelt

    By Elliot Almond, Special to the Seattle Times, September 1, 2023

    From the article…

    Pick a tree. Any colossal tree. The Ballard forest ecologist known as Big Tree Bob probably can identify it immediately; provide characteristics of size, physiology and growth patterns; and tell a fascinating backstory, like the one about the 1769 Portola expedition camping near El Palo Alto (Spanish for “tall stick”).

    Read the article

    Trees in Magnolia neighborhood

    Crosscut: Inside the tumultuous debate behind Seattle’s tree ordinance

    Inside the tumultuous debate behind Seattle’s tree ordinance

    by Eric Scigliano / Crosscut / September 1, 2023

    Trees in Magnolia neighborhood

    from the article…

    While the Master Builders Association of King and Snohomish Counties tried first to appeal, then to shape Seattle’s proposed Tree Protection Ordinance last year, one of its members staged another, parallel attack. Developer Rob McVicars’ target was not the ordinance but a member of the Urban Forestry Commission, the panel of experts and community representatives that advises Seattle’s mayor and city council on tree policies.

    Read the article

    Protesters supporting trees

    Seattle City Council’s actions belie empty talk of saving trees

    Seattle City Council’s actions belie empty talk of saving trees

    Seattle Times, Editorial Board,  August 23, 2023

    Protesters supporting trees

    The Seattle Times editorial board: 

    … Mayor Bruce Harrell did not hold a ceremony when he signed the ordinance, but on June 1, the Master Builders handed out awards to those who helped pass it, according to InvestigateWest….

    Read article

    North-seattle-ST-article

    Yes, Seattle, we can have both housing and trees

    by Naomi Ishisaka, Seattle Times, Aug 14, 2023

    ….The climate science research organization Climate Central found that of the 44 cities they analyzed, Seattle ranked in the top 5 for increased heat. Half of the city faces an “urban heat island” effect, or temperatures 8 degrees higher than found outside the city. 

    It is with this urgency in mind that there was fierce debate over new proposed Seattle tree regulations, called by proponents the “tree protection ordinance.” This measure, which passed the City Council 6-1 in May, overhauled the existing tree ordinance and, according to proponents, would cover up to 175,000 trees, far greater than the 17,700 under the existing ordinance. …

    Rainier Ave S

    Seattle’s Tree Ordinance Is an Affront to Climate Justice

    Seattle’s Tree Ordinance Is an Affront to Climate Justice

    by Susan Su, South Seattle Emerald – 6/24/2023

    Growing up as a low-income immigrant kid, Seattle’s trees were a wonder and a rare luxury for me, so our City Council’s latest canopy-damaging tree ordinance comes as a shock and disappointment. Did these people grow up in the same Seattle I did?

    Read article here

    European white elm

    Seattle Heritage Trees and the New Tree Ordinance

    European white elm

    Article by Eric Scigliano  on Post Alley – July 25,2023

    Eric Scigliano describes the issues the issues with inserting Seattle’s Heritage Tree program into the new Tree Protection Ordinance.

    A couple of quotes….

    Legislation often has unintended consequences. But rarely are those consequences so extreme and foreseeable as in the strange case of Seattle’s new Tree Protection Ordinance and its longtime, now ironically upended Heritage Tree Program.

    Response from a developer:

    …I need to double my money every three years,…

    Read the article here

    Luma the CMT Western Red-Cedar

    Luma News

    Luma News

    Luma

    The 80 foot, 200 year old Western Red-cedar, dubbed Luma, is slated to be chopped down by developers. Activists are trying to save it by occupying the tree, lobbying the city, and  holding Gratitude gatherings.

    Gratitude gathering for Luna
    Gratitude gathering for Luna
    Gratitude gathering for Luma
    0:00 / 0:00
    Droplet's First Day Protecting Luma

    Martha Baskin interviews Droplet

    Investigate West photo of a tree

    How Developers Helped Shape Seattle’s Controversial Tree Protection Ordinance

    Article by Eric Scigliono, Investigate West, July 19,2023

    Eric Scigliono traces the involvement of the Master Builds of King and Snohomish Counties (MBAKS) in the drafting of the developer-friendly tree “protection” ordinance passed by the City Council in May 2023.

    Marco Lowe was the MBAKS government affairs manager prior to becoming Bruce Harrell’s Chief Operating Officer.

    In February 2022, Mayor Harrell introduced a tree ordinance drafted by SDCI under his predecessor, Jennie Durkan. Apparently MBAKS didn’t like it….

    Eric goes on to say:

    The Master Builders, however, sued to block the draft ordinance, claiming it would make development “expensive, uncertain and problematic” and have “severe impacts on housing and other elements of the environment.” In August 2022, the city’s hearing examiner rejected their appeal, finding that the Master Builders hadn’t shown that saving trees would drive up housing costs.

    The Master Builders meanwhile set out to join and sway the effort rather than fight it. They offered their own proposal, trumpeting several feel-good gestures: a “citywide tree fund” that would collect fees to remove large trees and “award them where possible to organizations that focus on BIPOC youth tree education,” and “strategic tree planting” to form “pollination pathways for birds, bees, and other insects.” But their proposal also included a sweeping provision to let builders and homeowners “remove any tree… for any reason” — as long as they got permits and paid into the tree fund.

    Positive Provisions
    • Reduced exceptional trees definition (Tier 2) from 30” DBH to 24” DBH
    • Added tree groves (8 trees 12” DBH and larger) to exceptional trees (Tier 2) in ordinance
    • Tree groves can cross property lines
    • Grove remains a grove even if a tree or trees are removed during development
    • Limited non-development tree removal to two 6-12″ DBH trees/3 years from 9 non-exceptional trees(old exceptional tree definition, so any trees < 30″ DBH) /3 years in NR, LR, MR, Commercial and Seattle MIxed Zones
    • Registration of Tree Service Providers with SDCI, online reporting of removal of any trees 6+ inches DBH 6 business days prior to removal. Both for property owners and development. Tree Service Provider trucks must identify the company name.
    • Added Heritage trees as protected trees that cannot be removed unless hazardous or meet special requirements during development (only several hundred citywide – on SDCI map)
    • Required tree replacement for hazard trees and pest infected trees >12” DBH
    • States “The Director has authority to enforce provisions of this Chapter 25.11, issue permits, impose conditions and establish penalties for violations of applicable law or rules by the responsible party, establish administrative procedures and guidelines, conduct inspections and publish Director’s Rules that may be necessary to carry out the purposes of this Chapter 25.11”

    On property undergoing development:

    • All trees 6” DHB and larger must be on site plans (was 12” DBH in 2022 draft, 24” in 2009 draft)
    • All trees 12” DBH and larger must be replaced either on site or pay an in-lieu fee (previously only exceptional trees and trees > 24” DBH were to be replaced if removed but while in ordinance since 2001 was never enforced)
    • “In all zones Tier 1, Tier 2 and Tier 3 trees removed in association with development or because they are hazardous, infected by insects, pests or pathogens or are an invasive or nuisance…shall be replaced with one or more new trees …the tree replacement required shall be designed to result upon maturity, in a canopy cover that is roughly proportional to the canopy cover prior to tree removal”.
    • “Lot coverage calculation shall not include any portion of a parcel containing a biodiversity area or corridor, riparian corridor, priority habitat, priority area setback, wetland, wetland buffer, or steep slope erosion hazard area, unless the Director has approved critical area reduction, waiver or modification pursuant to Chapter 25.09”
    • All replacement trees planted citywide will be ‘on a web page through an online mapping tool by March 31, 2024 and are covered by a covenant for life of the tree
    • Replacement trees must be maintained and watered for 5 years (was 3 years in 2022 draft and not mentioned in SMC 25.11 previously).
    • Replacement trees that die within 5 years must be replaced (100% for 1 and 80% for more than 1)
    • Put in ordinance and strengthened tree protection area requirements
    • Tree Protection areas based on 1 foot radius increase per 1” diameter (2022 draft was based on canopy cover area)
    • Tree protection areas for off site trees are added to building site plans